Posting the last entry, I realized that I’ve had this blog for over a year. That’s kinda crazy to think about. Now I’m not one for introspection . . . okay, that’s a ridiculous lie. I partake of introspection quite a bit, though it is debatable whether I am able to glean any insights into myself from it. Wait. Does that count? You’ll allow it? Sweet!
Anyway,
it is rather remarkable the differences a year can make. New city.
New state. New job. And yet, some things haven’t changed. I still really enjoy doing this,
communicating science to others.
Hopefully, I am able to continue this with the same level of
enjoyment. And as always, for those of
you that read the blog and/or contribute questions, thank you!
Now
enough sappiness. On to the question!
Okay, just a little
more sap.
Chris
H asks, “Epigenetics is quite the buzz-word of late. What, if anything, does
the father contribute to the epigenome? Is it a percentage? Or certain things?”
Yay! Another biology question! I really enjoy these.
Before
I begin, let’s do a little recap.
Remember how I earlier gave a brief explanation
of genetics? Basically, DNA holds a person’s genetic
information; the information is converted to RNA and then translated into
proteins which do things for the cell, lots of things. This whole process, from DNA to RNA to
protein to beyond, is very tightly controlled and regulated. In fact, for most genes, the most important form
of control is transcriptional control, which deals with the conversion of the
information from DNA to RNA. This makes
sense. Controlling at this step ensures
that the cell does not create unnecessary, and therefore wasteful,
intermediates.
One
of the methods of transcriptional control is at the level of chromatin
structure. Chromatin is the combination
of DNA with proteins and other macromolecules.
It not only protects your DNA but also condenses it so that it can fit
inside the nucleus of each of your cells.*
But condensing the DNA enough to fit in the nucleus makes it difficult
for the proteins that transcribe the RNA from DNA to read the code and do their
job. So the cell has to loosen the
chromatin around genes when they need to be “turned on” and transcribed. In addition, not all cells need every gene
product the genome codes for. Muscle
cells don’t need to make proteins necessary for bone cells, and red blood cells
would have problems if they produced the adhesion proteins that keep intestinal
cells held to each other without leaking.
So body cells need a way to keep some genes “turned off”. So the cell will add chemical modifications
to the chromatin proteins which cause the structure to loosen (allowing for
more gene transcription) or cause the structure to tighten (limiting gene
transcription).
Another
type of transcriptional control occurs when the chemical structure of the DNA
itself is modified. One of the four DNA bases,
cytosine, has a methyl group (a carbon atom that is bonded to three hydrogen
atoms) added to it to become 5-Methylcytosine. It still pairs to guanine, but regions that
contain high amounts of this modified base are less active when it comes to
transcription.
It is important to
understand that neither of these types of control change the underlying DNA
code, they merely change the behavior of genes, allowing some to be transcribed
more while others are transcribed less.
But
what do these transcriptional control mechanisms have to do with the question
at hand? Epigenetics is the
study of external or environmental factors that turn genes 'on' and 'off' and
affect how cells 'read' genes. And
an epigenetic trait is a “stably heritable
phenotype resulting from changes in a chromosome without alterations in the DNA
sequence”. So these two transcriptional control
mechanisms are examples of epigenetic modifications that occur in a chromosome.
Additionally,
due to their nature and purpose, these changes tend to be inherited by the
daughter cells after a cell divides. Amongst
other things, this allows a cell to keep certain genes turned off throughout
its descendants, which can function as another layer of protection so muscle
cells do not produce proteins that are only necessary for bone cells or brain
cells produce proteins that are only necessary for liver cells.
But
with regards to the question, do these epigenetic markers survive into the next
generation? And the answer is . . . drum
roll please . . .
Eh. Close enough.
Nope. They do not.
Except when they do.
This
is biology we’re talking about.
Exceptions abound.
Normally,
after a sperm and an egg meet and fertilization occurs, the epigenetic markers
are wiped clean. Remember that
epigenetic markers help silence genes in one cell type that are only used by a
different cell type. So the markers must
be removed so that all the different cell types can develop properly (the
markers will be replaced as cellular differentiation occurs). In
mammals, it is thought that this process of removal occurs very early in life,
just after fertilization.
But
some genes keep their epigenetic markers after fertilization. Imprinted genes are able to keep their
epigenetic markers past fertilization (though they are not the only type of
genes that can). Imprinted genes can be
inherited from either the father or the mother.
It is currently estimated that about 1%
of mammalian genes are imprinted.
As
for how much the father contributes to the epigenetic state of the offspring,
it is not currently known. Epigenetics
is still a relatively young field of study.
However, it is known that the father
does contribute at least some epigenetic markers so it isn’t zero. My guess
(and it is completely a guess since this is not my field of study and I couldn’t
find anything about it while researching for this post) is that the father and
the mother each contribute roughly the same amount to what little epigenetic
markers survive being wiped clean after fertilization.
*It
is estimated that each cell in the human body has about 2 meters of DNA in the
nucleus. It is also estimated that there
are about 50 trillion cells in the human body.
So there is about 100 trillion meters of DNA in your body, enough (as this source
mentions)
to make it to the Sun and back more than three hundred time!
No comments:
Post a Comment